Skip to main content

Antimatter - The Long Lost Cousin of Matter



A beautiful quote by Paul Dirac

Many of you physics lovers would have figured out what I am gonna talk about

Yes,
The contrary to matter - Antimattter

So now let's have a brief insight about it

Antimatter:


Classical physics only allowed systems to have positive energy. But Dirac’s new theory of relativistic quantum mechanics allowed for a particle with negative energy solution, as a counterpart to the familiar positive-energy electron.
After ruling out the possibility that this particle was simply the proton – which has a hugely greater mass – Dirac predicted the existence of a new particle with the same mass of the electron but with a charge that was positive rather than negative.

It’s now understood that all particles have an equivalent antimatter particle with opposite charge and quantum spin – although some are their own antiparticle. However hardly any antimatter is seen in the observable universe, and why there should be vastly much more normal matter is one of the great unsolved problems in physics.

It was once thought that matter could neither be created nor destroyed, but we now know that energy and mass are interchangeable. When a particle collides with its antiparticle the two annihilate each other, with their mass being entirely converted into energy.
Antimatter annihilations convert the entire mass of the particles involved into energy, following Albert Einstein’s famous equation E = MC (squared).

A great deal of energy can be produced from little mass – a kilogram of matter annihilating with the same amount of antimatter will release around as much as the Tsar Bomba, the largest thermonuclear bomb ever built.
Because of this, antimatter has been touted as a possible future weapon or source of fuel – antimatter-driven propulsion is a staple of science fiction.

However, antimatter currently takes far too long to produce, and at too high an energy cost, for either weapons or fuel to be practicable. CERN claims it has taken several hundred million pounds to produce just a billionth of a gram, and that to make a gram of antimatter would take about a 100 billion years.
So what happened to all the antimatter:

The Big Bang produced equal amount of matter and antimatter but today what we see is only Matter , Where did the antimatter go ?
When matter and antimatter combine thhey cease to exist and  form a photon
Then one should think why isn't the universe full of photon ?!
Well I can't answer it but the Large Hadron Collider may give us answers.

Some scientists have given an explanation on what happenned to the anti particles,which are as follows :
i. The early universe allowedd Conservation Law Violation                  (This makes me jealous of it)
ii. Anti particles decay faster than Normal particles
iii. They exist in equal amounts but superfast expansion of universe pulled them apart (My favorite) which means some galaxies out there could be Antimatter  Galaxies
So which one are you a fan of tell me in the comments And also mention whether you think Antimatter exists in large quantities
That is it for today 
Comment to know about other interesting topics
Your
Universal Physics Expert signing off
Khushil

Comments

  1. Please share this site to other people so that I can promote Astrophysics and Earthly Physics throughout the world

    ReplyDelete
  2. Dear Khushil, this is well researched and quite easy to understand by everyone. Well done and keep up the good work. I would love to read more such diverse and interesting topics.
    All the best 😊
    - Deekshitha

    ReplyDelete
  3. An Avid fan of anti matter galaxies... Even if one is discovered, the next colonies will be with anti matter galaxies... because they will be the source of tremendous energy if brought to or nearby earth

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Very Happy to know that
      Why don't you also suggest a topic
      Today's topic will be Particle - Wave Duality
      Thanks

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

God Doesn't Play Dice

Hello Guys and welcome back to my blog !!! Today we are going to talk about a huge controversy on Science during 1920s...   Albert Einstein   is one of the greatest and certainly best known physicists. If you ask anyone to name a physicist the most common answer you will receive is “Einstein”. Einstein is also famous for his quotations. Among the many Einstein’s quotations one is particularly popular among the general public: “God does not play dice”. But what did Einstein mean by this? The quotation says, “Quantum theory yields much, but it hardly brings us close to the Old One’s secrets. I, in any case, am convinced He does not play dice with the universe.” It was addressed by Einstein to Max Born (one of the fathers of Quantum Mechanics) in a letter that he wrote to Born in 1926. The “Old one” and “He” Einstein refers to is God. The fame of this quotation stems from two sources: 1) Einstein’s disagreement with the fundamental concept of Quantum Mecha

The duo of Waves and Particles

Hello guys and welcome back to my blog Today we are going to answer a question aboout explaining particle wave duality So hold tight and off we go Particle wave duality : Publicized early in the debate about whether light was composed of particles or waves, a wave-particle dual nature soon was found to be characteristic of electrons as well. The evidence for the description of light as waves was well established at the turn of the century when the photoelectric effect introduced firm evidence of a particle nature as well. Wave-particle duality , possession by physical entities (such as  light  and  electrons ) of both wavelike and particle-like characteristics. On the basis of experimental evidence, German physicist  Albert Einstein  first showed (1905) that  light , which had been considered a form of  electromagnetic waves , must also be thought of as particle-like, localized in packets of discrete  energy . The observations of the  Compton effect  (1922) by Ameri