Skip to main content

Antimatter - The Long Lost Cousin of Matter



A beautiful quote by Paul Dirac

Many of you physics lovers would have figured out what I am gonna talk about

Yes,
The contrary to matter - Antimattter

So now let's have a brief insight about it

Antimatter:


Classical physics only allowed systems to have positive energy. But Dirac’s new theory of relativistic quantum mechanics allowed for a particle with negative energy solution, as a counterpart to the familiar positive-energy electron.
After ruling out the possibility that this particle was simply the proton – which has a hugely greater mass – Dirac predicted the existence of a new particle with the same mass of the electron but with a charge that was positive rather than negative.

It’s now understood that all particles have an equivalent antimatter particle with opposite charge and quantum spin – although some are their own antiparticle. However hardly any antimatter is seen in the observable universe, and why there should be vastly much more normal matter is one of the great unsolved problems in physics.

It was once thought that matter could neither be created nor destroyed, but we now know that energy and mass are interchangeable. When a particle collides with its antiparticle the two annihilate each other, with their mass being entirely converted into energy.
Antimatter annihilations convert the entire mass of the particles involved into energy, following Albert Einstein’s famous equation E = MC (squared).

A great deal of energy can be produced from little mass – a kilogram of matter annihilating with the same amount of antimatter will release around as much as the Tsar Bomba, the largest thermonuclear bomb ever built.
Because of this, antimatter has been touted as a possible future weapon or source of fuel – antimatter-driven propulsion is a staple of science fiction.

However, antimatter currently takes far too long to produce, and at too high an energy cost, for either weapons or fuel to be practicable. CERN claims it has taken several hundred million pounds to produce just a billionth of a gram, and that to make a gram of antimatter would take about a 100 billion years.
So what happened to all the antimatter:

The Big Bang produced equal amount of matter and antimatter but today what we see is only Matter , Where did the antimatter go ?
When matter and antimatter combine thhey cease to exist and  form a photon
Then one should think why isn't the universe full of photon ?!
Well I can't answer it but the Large Hadron Collider may give us answers.

Some scientists have given an explanation on what happenned to the anti particles,which are as follows :
i. The early universe allowedd Conservation Law Violation                  (This makes me jealous of it)
ii. Anti particles decay faster than Normal particles
iii. They exist in equal amounts but superfast expansion of universe pulled them apart (My favorite) which means some galaxies out there could be Antimatter  Galaxies
So which one are you a fan of tell me in the comments And also mention whether you think Antimatter exists in large quantities
That is it for today 
Comment to know about other interesting topics
Your
Universal Physics Expert signing off
Khushil

Comments

  1. Please share this site to other people so that I can promote Astrophysics and Earthly Physics throughout the world

    ReplyDelete
  2. Dear Khushil, this is well researched and quite easy to understand by everyone. Well done and keep up the good work. I would love to read more such diverse and interesting topics.
    All the best 😊
    - Deekshitha

    ReplyDelete
  3. An Avid fan of anti matter galaxies... Even if one is discovered, the next colonies will be with anti matter galaxies... because they will be the source of tremendous energy if brought to or nearby earth

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Very Happy to know that
      Why don't you also suggest a topic
      Today's topic will be Particle - Wave Duality
      Thanks

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

God Doesn't Play Dice

Hello Guys and welcome back to my blog !!! Today we are going to talk about a huge controversy on Science during 1920s...   Albert Einstein   is one of the greatest and certainly best known physicists. If you ask anyone to name a physicist the most common answer you will receive is “Einstein”. Einstein is also famous for his quotations. Among the many Einstein’s quotations one is particularly popular among the general public: “God does not play dice”. But what did Einstein mean by this? The quotation says, “Quantum theory yields much, but it hardly brings us close to the Old One’s secrets. I, in any case, am convinced He does not play dice with the universe.” It was addressed by Einstein to Max Born (one of the fathers of Quantum Mechanics) in a letter that he wrote to Born in 1926. The “Old one” and “He” Einstein refers to is God. The fame of this quotation stems from two sources: 1) Einstein’s disagreement with the fundamental concept of Quan...

I hate you Aristotleeeee...

"The trouble with the world is not that people know too little; it's that they know so many things that just aren't so" Mark Twain Hello guys and welcome back to my blog Today we are going to talk about misconceptions induced in our mind by  Aristotle So gear up and off we go 1) ' Everything that moves, will eventually come to a stop. Rest is the “natural” state of all objects' Like seriously... Had he been alive for 2009 more years he would have suicided of guilt and tons of bruises on him for leading humanity towards the wrong way for 2009 years (Almost two millenniums wasted on wrong ideas) Newton's first law of motion was that "Every body in the universe continues to be in its state of rest or motion unless acted upon by an external force" Or in simple words "If the external forces on a body are balanced , then the body will continue to have zero acceleration due to which it will continually have constant velocity ...