Skip to main content

The duo of Waves and Particles



Hello guys and welcome back to my blog
Today we are going to answer a question aboout explaining particle wave duality

So hold tight and off we go

Particle wave duality :

Publicized early in the debate about whether light was composed of particles or waves, a wave-particle dual nature soon was found to be characteristic of electrons as well. The evidence for the description of light as waves was well established at the turn of the century when the photoelectric effect introduced firm evidence of a particle nature as well.



Wave-particle duality, possession by physical entities (such as light and electrons) of both wavelike and particle-like characteristics. On the basis of experimental evidence, German physicist Albert Einstein first showed (1905) that light, which had been considered a form of electromagnetic waves, must also be thought of as particle-like, localized in packets of discrete energy. The observations of the Compton effect (1922) by American physicist Arthur Holly Compton could be explained only if light had a wave-particle duality. French physicist Louis de Broglie proposed (1924) that electrons and other discrete bits of matter, which until then had been conceived only as material particles, also have wave properties such as wavelength and frequency. Later (1927) the wave nature of electrons was experimentally established by American physicists Clinton Davisson and Lester Germer and independently by English physicist George Paget Thomson. An understanding of the complementary relation between the wave aspects and the particle aspects of the same phenomenon was announced by Danish physicist Niels Bohr in 1928 (see complementarity principle).



So basically A photon has properties of a point particle and a wave .

Hope you understood



So any other questions ???????

Till then Bye ,

Your
Universal Physics Expert

Signing Off
Khushil


Comments

  1. Hey, this is interesting. So, when is it a particle; and when a wave? or rather, does it convert? or is there a constant dual nature?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I will answer it tomorrow for you
      Thanks for taking interest
      Hope you liked it
      Do you have any other questions ??

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Antimatter - The Long Lost Cousin of Matter

A beautiful quote by Paul Dirac Many of you physics lovers would have figured out what I am gonna talk about Yes, The contrary to matter - Antimattter So now let's have a brief insight about it Antimatter: Classical physics only allowed systems to have positive energy. But Dirac’s new theory of relativistic quantum mechanics allowed for a particle with negative energy solution, as a counterpart to the familiar positive-energy electron. After ruling out the possibility that this particle was simply the proton – which has a hugely greater mass – Dirac predicted the existence of a new particle with the same mass of the electron but with a charge that was positive rather than negative. It’s now understood that all particles have an equivalent antimatter particle with opposite charge and quantum spin – although some are their own antiparticle. However hardly any antimatter is seen in the observable universe, and why there should be vastly much more normal ma

God Doesn't Play Dice

Hello Guys and welcome back to my blog !!! Today we are going to talk about a huge controversy on Science during 1920s...   Albert Einstein   is one of the greatest and certainly best known physicists. If you ask anyone to name a physicist the most common answer you will receive is “Einstein”. Einstein is also famous for his quotations. Among the many Einstein’s quotations one is particularly popular among the general public: “God does not play dice”. But what did Einstein mean by this? The quotation says, “Quantum theory yields much, but it hardly brings us close to the Old One’s secrets. I, in any case, am convinced He does not play dice with the universe.” It was addressed by Einstein to Max Born (one of the fathers of Quantum Mechanics) in a letter that he wrote to Born in 1926. The “Old one” and “He” Einstein refers to is God. The fame of this quotation stems from two sources: 1) Einstein’s disagreement with the fundamental concept of Quantum Mecha