Skip to main content

God Doesn't Play Dice












Hello Guys and welcome back to my blog !!!

Today we are going to talk about a huge controversy on Science during 1920s...


 Albert Einstein is one of the greatest and certainly best known physicists. If you ask anyone to name a physicist the most common answer you will receive is “Einstein”. Einstein is also famous for his quotations. Among the many Einstein’s quotations one is particularly popular among the general public: “God does not play dice”. But what did Einstein mean by this?

The quotation says, “Quantum theory yields much, but it hardly brings us close to the Old One’s secrets. I, in any case, am convinced He does not play dice with the universe.” It was addressed by Einstein to Max Born (one of the fathers of Quantum Mechanics) in a letter that he wrote to Born in 1926.

The “Old one” and “He” Einstein refers to is God. The fame of this quotation stems from two sources: 1) Einstein’s disagreement with the fundamental concept of Quantum Mechanics that at the quantum (i.e. atomic) level nature and the universe are totally random, namely events happen by mere chance; 2) Einstein’s views about religion and God.


So Who was Max Born

Max Born is widely credited, along with Werner Heisenberg, Erwin Schrödinger, Niels Bohr, and Max Planck, as one of the founders of quantum mechanics. Quantum mechanics, also known as quantum physics, is the branch of physics that studies matter at the very small level, from the atomic to sub-atomic levels. Although quantum mechanics is known for its spooky and strange behavior, it can also be considered one of the most exciting fields of physics today. According to Helix magazine, nearly all the Nobel Prizes in Physics awarded over the past one hundred years have some relation to quantum physics.

The Actual Max Born's theory is very complicated which I will explain in the next post

Till then I would like to ask you all a question based on Astrophysics

Name one particle without an anti particle???

(Answers will be published tomorrow)
Till then Bye

Your
Universal Physics Expert

Signing Off
Khushil

Comments

  1. Science and religion are not at odds. Science is simply too young to understand.

    The best thing that supports Max is the whole theory of probability and conditional probability. The Math of no. of possible occurrences of outcomes of rolling a die; the 1/6 association to each face; is simply stupendous scientific establishment of randomness

    ReplyDelete
  2. Would you like to suggest another topic that I can post about today ?!

    Also What is your name ?!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey Mate....!!!!

      It's really interesting to xplore physics wid u...

      Cn we look into Particle Wave Duality...???

      Delete
    2. Sure
      I will post it tomorrow as today's topic is Higgs boson
      Tomorrow's topic will be particle wave duality

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Antimatter - The Long Lost Cousin of Matter

A beautiful quote by Paul Dirac Many of you physics lovers would have figured out what I am gonna talk about Yes, The contrary to matter - Antimattter So now let's have a brief insight about it Antimatter: Classical physics only allowed systems to have positive energy. But Dirac’s new theory of relativistic quantum mechanics allowed for a particle with negative energy solution, as a counterpart to the familiar positive-energy electron. After ruling out the possibility that this particle was simply the proton – which has a hugely greater mass – Dirac predicted the existence of a new particle with the same mass of the electron but with a charge that was positive rather than negative. It’s now understood that all particles have an equivalent antimatter particle with opposite charge and quantum spin – although some are their own antiparticle. However hardly any antimatter is seen in the observable universe, and why there should be vastly much more normal ma

The duo of Waves and Particles

Hello guys and welcome back to my blog Today we are going to answer a question aboout explaining particle wave duality So hold tight and off we go Particle wave duality : Publicized early in the debate about whether light was composed of particles or waves, a wave-particle dual nature soon was found to be characteristic of electrons as well. The evidence for the description of light as waves was well established at the turn of the century when the photoelectric effect introduced firm evidence of a particle nature as well. Wave-particle duality , possession by physical entities (such as  light  and  electrons ) of both wavelike and particle-like characteristics. On the basis of experimental evidence, German physicist  Albert Einstein  first showed (1905) that  light , which had been considered a form of  electromagnetic waves , must also be thought of as particle-like, localized in packets of discrete  energy . The observations of the  Compton effect  (1922) by Ameri